Details

    • New Feature
    • Status: Closed
    • Major
    • Resolution: Won't Do
    • None
    • None
    • docs, library
    • SDK10: KVError, RBAC, User Mgt, SDK12: FF, KVError, User M, SDK18: Eph,FF,sdk-rfc done,EM

    Description

      If any changes are required in lcb, per spec in sdk-rfc #22, add User Management features.

      If not, simply close as invalid or such.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          No reviews matched the request. Check your Options in the drop-down menu of this sections header.

          Activity

            We won't implement user management functionality in lcb. This is simple enough to do with the REST API directly, and other SDKs don't need to wrap lcb for this.

            LCB does implement some management functionality, however it only does so when it saves time/effort for wrappers (e.g. where internal retries and such are needed). In such situations we implement it in LCB not for end-user consumption but to eliminate the need for multiple SDKs to implement the same logic multiple times. So for example, lcb implements index management functionality.

            Even when lcb does implement management functions, it is only done partially, as a JSON-encoded object is required upon input.

            mnunberg Mark Nunberg (Inactive) added a comment - We won't implement user management functionality in lcb. This is simple enough to do with the REST API directly, and other SDKs don't need to wrap lcb for this. LCB does implement some management functionality, however it only does so when it saves time/effort for wrappers (e.g. where internal retries and such are needed). In such situations we implement it in LCB not for end-user consumption but to eliminate the need for multiple SDKs to implement the same logic multiple times. So for example, lcb implements index management functionality. Even when lcb does implement management functions, it is only done partially, as a JSON-encoded object is required upon input.

            People

              mnunberg Mark Nunberg (Inactive)
              ingenthr Matt Ingenthron
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Gerrit Reviews

                  There are no open Gerrit changes

                  PagerDuty