Uploaded image for project: 'Couchbase Java Client'
  1. Couchbase Java Client
  2. JCBC-1250

Add new volatile Collections API

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • New Feature
    • Status: Resolved
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • None
    • 3.0.0-alpha.1
    • None

    Description

      In a style consistent with what we're currently thinking of with SDK 3.0, add API that implements get, upsert, insert, replace, remove with support for scopes and collections.

      Attachments

        No reviews matched the request. Check your Options in the drop-down menu of this sections header.

        Activity

          Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
          ingenthr Matt Ingenthron added a comment -

          Subhashni Balakrishnan: I don't think this should target 2.7.1, but rather target 3.0.0-dp, right?

          ingenthr Matt Ingenthron added a comment - Subhashni Balakrishnan : I don't think this should target 2.7.1, but rather target 3.0.0-dp, right?
          subhashni Subhashni Balakrishnan (Inactive) added a comment -

          The first volatile implementation for internal use and testing collections is on the 2.7 client, it wont use the new core or break any api. Should we bump the major for this one?

          subhashni Subhashni Balakrishnan (Inactive) added a comment - The first volatile implementation for internal use and testing collections is on the 2.7 client, it wont use the new core or break any api. Should we bump the major for this one?
          ingenthr Matt Ingenthron added a comment -

          While it's built atop 2.7.0 code, putting it on that fix version implies we'll be shipping it in 2.7.1, which we won't though, right? This is on a separate branch/gerrit topic. We definitely don't want to ship it in 2.7.1.

          ingenthr Matt Ingenthron added a comment - While it's built atop 2.7.0 code, putting it on that fix version implies we'll be shipping it in 2.7.1, which we won't though, right? This is on a separate branch/gerrit topic. We definitely don't want to ship it in 2.7.1.
          subhashni Subhashni Balakrishnan (Inactive) added a comment -

          Yes, then it makes sense to call it 3.0.0-dp.

          subhashni Subhashni Balakrishnan (Inactive) added a comment - Yes, then it makes sense to call it 3.0.0-dp.

          People

            subhashni Subhashni Balakrishnan (Inactive)
            ingenthr Matt Ingenthron
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Gerrit Reviews

                There are no open Gerrit changes

                PagerDuty