Uploaded image for project: 'Couchbase Server'
  1. Couchbase Server
  2. MB-36946

cbsummary command displaying N/A for CPU in openshift cluster

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Major
    • Resolution: User Error
    • 6.5.0
    • 7.0.0
    • ns_server
    • None
    • Untriaged
    • No

    Description

      mutli-node openshift cluster

      "3 node cluster
      4 vCPUs
      16 GB RAM"

      "cluster_num cluster_uuid cluster_size hostname cpu_cores RAM
      0 feffc4f891d630ff65083f121d942857 3 cb-example-0000.cb-example.operator-example-namespace.svc:8091 N/A 15.5
      0 feffc4f891d630ff65083f121d942857 3 cb-example-0001.cb-example.operator-example-namespace.svc:8091 N/A 15.5
      0 feffc4f891d630ff65083f121d942857 3 cb-example-0002.cb-example.operator-example-namespace.svc:8091 N/A 15.5"

      Attachments

        No reviews matched the request. Check your Options in the drop-down menu of this sections header.

        Activity

          Not owned by the tools team, removing it as a component

          pvarley Patrick Varley added a comment - Not owned by the tools team, removing it as a component
          eben Eben Haber added a comment -

          Adding ns_server as a component, since cbsummary is reporting the number of cores provided by ns_server pools default.

          eben Eben Haber added a comment - Adding ns_server as a component, since cbsummary is reporting the number of cores provided by ns_server pools default.
          eben Eben Haber added a comment -

          Arunkumar Senthilnathan, which version was the server that you were running against? CPU is only supported for 6.5 and above, so any earlier cluster will report N/A for CPU.

          eben Eben Haber added a comment - Arunkumar Senthilnathan , which version was the server that you were running against? CPU is only supported for 6.5 and above, so any earlier cluster will report N/A for CPU.

          Eben Haber makes sense - I think this was 6.0.3 - will reopen it if issue occurs in 6.5

          arunkumar Arunkumar Senthilnathan (Inactive) added a comment - Eben Haber makes sense - I think this was 6.0.3 - will reopen it if issue occurs in 6.5

          People

            arunkumar Arunkumar Senthilnathan (Inactive)
            arunkumar Arunkumar Senthilnathan (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Gerrit Reviews

                There are no open Gerrit changes

                PagerDuty