Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Resolved
-
Critical
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Elixir
-
7.5.0-3163
-
Untriaged
-
-
1
-
Unknown
Description
- create 75 databases
- create 5 and 10 fts indexes on databases alternatively.
- FTS crashed during the index creation. RAM is at >95% just during the indexes creation.
Service 'fts' exited with status 2. Restarting. Messages:/home/couchbase/.cbdepscache/gomodcache/pkg/mod/google.golang.org/grpc@v1.31.0/server.go:786 +0x38created by google.golang.org/grpc.(*Server).handleRawConn/home/couchbase/.cbdepscache/gomodcache/pkg/mod/google.golang.org/grpc@v1.31.0/server.go:785 +0x3fcgoroutine 5599002 [select]:google.golang.org/grpc/internal/transport.(*controlBuffer).get(0x476d2bf4a0, 0x1)/home/couchbase/.cbdepscache/gomodcache/pkg/mod/google.golang.org/grpc@v1.31.0/internal/transport/controlbuf.go:395 +0x15cgoogle.golang.org/grpc/internal/transport.(*loopyWriter).run(0x46e3aeb9e0)/home/couchbase/.cbdepscache/gomodcache/pkg/mod/google.golang.org/grpc@v1.31.0/internal/transport/controlbuf.go:515 +0x78google.golang.org/grpc/internal/transport.newHTTP2Server.func2()/home/couchbase/.cbdepscache/gomodcache/pkg/mod/google.golang.org/grpc@v1.31.0/internal/transport/http2_server.go:291 +0xdccreated by google.golang.org/grpc/internal/transport.newHTTP2Server/home/couchbase/.cbdepscache/gomodcache/pkg/mod/google.golang.org/grpc@v1.31.0/internal/transport/http2_server.go:288 +0x115c
On node o52smyma8clav-lj.8eh8ignk6evjoni9.sandbox.nonprod-project-avengers.com system memory use is 97.14% of total available memory, above the critical threshold of 95%.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is duplicated by
-
-
- Resolved
-
Activity
Hello Shelby Ramsey, the fts index definition looks something like below:
def get_fts_idx_template(self):
|
fts_idx_template = {
|
"type": "fulltext-index", |
"name": "fts-index", |
"sourceType": "gocbcore", |
"sourceName": "default", |
"planParams": { |
"maxPartitionsPerPIndex": 1024, |
"indexPartitions": 1, |
"numReplicas": 1 |
},
|
"params": { |
"doc_config": { |
"docid_prefix_delim": "", |
"docid_regexp": "", |
"mode": "scope.collection.type_field", |
"type_field": "type" |
},
|
"mapping": { |
"analysis": {}, |
"default_analyzer": "standard", |
"default_datetime_parser": "dateTimeOptional", |
"default_field": "_all", |
"default_mapping": { |
"dynamic": True, |
"enabled": False |
},
|
"default_type": "_default", |
"docvalues_dynamic": False, |
"index_dynamic": True, |
"store_dynamic": False, |
"type_field": "_type", |
"types": {scope.collection: "dynamic": True, "enabled": True} |
},
|
"store": { |
"indexType": "scorch", |
"segmentVersion": 15 |
}
|
},
|
"sourceParams": {} |
}
|
return fts_idx_template |
I think it indexes all fields in the collection on which it is created. As of now i create the same indexes across buckets/collections. I will work on indexes improvement/variety soon...
Hello Abhi Dangeti, I am caught up in some other part of the testing hence taken a pause on FTS portion of the volume test. Will be back to it soon...
Marking this as resolved for now, as there's no other planned fixes at this time.
Ritesh Agarwal I see a new build's available with that fix^. When you're ready - can you let us know how we do.