Details

      Description

      http://www.couchbase.com/docs/couchbase-manual-2.0/couchbase-admin-tasks-working-set-mgmt.html

      -"then both replica data and data written directly the node from clients will be ejected"...not a complete sentence, and we refer to it as "replica data and active data" or "data in replica vbuckets and active vbuckets"
      -"Note that when you change either of these settings, you provide a percentage of total RAM for a node such as 60%"...they can be set as EITHER a percentage or an absolute number, and are always stored as an absolute number
      -"The pager will try to eject 60% of random replica items from other nodes, and only 40% of items that had been written directly to the node from a client."...this is very confusing to say that it is ejecting random data from other nodes, and data written directly from a client. Just use the replica vbuckets and active vbuckets concept
      -Typo: "writes and item"
      -Typo: "that the items is frequently used"
      -Why are there two different sections for configuring ejection settings? http://www.couchbase.com/docs/couchbase-manual-2.0/couchbase-admin-tasks-percentage-ejection.html, http://www.couchbase.com/docs/couchbase-manual-2.0/couchbase-admin-tasks-water-marks.html
      -This page: http://www.couchbase.com/docs/couchbase-manual-2.0/couchbase-admin-tasks-percentage-ejection.html is very confusing, redundant with the previous page, and also refers confusingly to replica and source nodes as opposed to replica/active vbuckets
      -Typo on above page: "However, if have the server eject a very large percentage of replica data,"

      No reviews matched the request. Check your Options in the drop-down menu of this sections header.

        Activity

        perry Perry Krug created issue -
        dipti Dipti Borkar made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        Assignee MC Brown [ mccouch ] Karen Zeller [ kzeller ]
        Hide
        kzeller kzeller added a comment -

        -remove duplicate section
        -fix typos
        -rewrite to discuss replica and active data and possible ejection.

        Show
        kzeller kzeller added a comment - -remove duplicate section -fix typos -rewrite to discuss replica and active data and possible ejection.
        kzeller kzeller made changes -
        Status Open [ 1 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
        Hide
        kzeller kzeller added a comment -

        See fixes

        Show
        kzeller kzeller added a comment - See fixes
        kzeller kzeller made changes -
        Status Resolved [ 5 ] Closed [ 6 ]
        Hide
        perry Perry Krug added a comment -

        Thanks Karen.

        -I still think it's a very odd layout to have those two "settings" sections be separate and so short...why not combine them since they're very related?
        -It's also a little confusing to show that the watermarks are set as 3.2GB...they're always expressed in full bytes

        Show
        perry Perry Krug added a comment - Thanks Karen. -I still think it's a very odd layout to have those two "settings" sections be separate and so short...why not combine them since they're very related? -It's also a little confusing to show that the watermarks are set as 3.2GB...they're always expressed in full bytes
        perry Perry Krug made changes -
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
        Status Closed [ 6 ] Reopened [ 4 ]
        kzeller kzeller made changes -
        Assignee Karen Zeller [ kzeller ] Perry Krug [ perry ]
        Hide
        kzeller kzeller added a comment -

        Oops, when I reassigned back to you for more info, it blew away my questions:

        1) Name the sections you want to have consolidated

        2) If it is only two subsections it is bad form to consolidate into one:

        Bad:

        1. Main Section
        a. subsection alone

        Better

        1. Main
        a. sub 1
        b. sub 2

        -OR-

        1. Main with everything

        let me know what makes better sense to our customers

        Show
        kzeller kzeller added a comment - Oops, when I reassigned back to you for more info, it blew away my questions: 1) Name the sections you want to have consolidated 2) If it is only two subsections it is bad form to consolidate into one: Bad: 1. Main Section a. subsection alone Better 1. Main a. sub 1 b. sub 2 - OR - 1. Main with everything let me know what makes better sense to our customers
        Hide
        perry Perry Krug added a comment -

        I agree that one subsection seems odd, though it would still kind of work in this situation where you would have:
        1. Main descriptive information
        a. How to change settings

        But if that's still a problem, I would say putting the whole thing together...it's really awkward IMO to have these very small sections separated if the user is trying to read/understand all that's available.

        Show
        perry Perry Krug added a comment - I agree that one subsection seems odd, though it would still kind of work in this situation where you would have: 1. Main descriptive information a. How to change settings But if that's still a problem, I would say putting the whole thing together...it's really awkward IMO to have these very small sections separated if the user is trying to read/understand all that's available.
        perry Perry Krug made changes -
        Assignee Perry Krug [ perry ] Karen Scarpelli [ karen ]
        perry Perry Krug made changes -
        Assignee Karen Scarpelli [ karen ] Karen Zeller [ kzeller ]
        Hide
        kzeller kzeller added a comment -

        I'm going to go with the "main section with everything approach" then.

        I've added the absolute byte info you have here.

        Show
        kzeller kzeller added a comment - I'm going to go with the "main section with everything approach" then. I've added the absolute byte info you have here.
        Hide
        kzeller kzeller added a comment -
        Show
        kzeller kzeller added a comment - Final fixes, consolidation and cross ref: https://github.com/couchbase/docs/commit/da01c1a9cb0a1f0552ab0a0cb4009495945df722
        kzeller kzeller made changes -
        Status Reopened [ 4 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
        Hide
        kzeller kzeller added a comment -
        Show
        kzeller kzeller added a comment - Final fixes, consolidation and cross ref: https://github.com/couchbase/docs/commit/da01c1a9cb0a1f0552ab0a0cb4009495945df722
        kzeller kzeller made changes -
        Status Resolved [ 5 ] Closed [ 6 ]

          People

          • Assignee:
            kzeller kzeller
            Reporter:
            perry Perry Krug
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Gerrit Reviews

              There are no open Gerrit changes