Details
-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Major
-
3.0
-
Security Level: Public
-
Untriaged
-
Yes
Description
Just a follow-up on your comment in MB-9822:
"Actually I just found that we're seemingly not doing swt low in 3.0. This might easily be "it". AFAIK I did that on purpose but I don't recall why."
I wish we could clarify [and justify] the purpose.
Attachments
For Gerrit Dashboard: MB-11281 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Subject | Branch | Project | Status | CR | V |
37736,4 | MB-11281: Revert⁴ ".... pass swt low to child erlang" | master | ns_server | Status: MERGED | +2 | +1 |