Uploaded image for project: 'Couchbase Server'
  1. Couchbase Server
  2. MB-7558

We don't replicate the lock time related to "get and lock"

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: 1.8.1, 2.0
    • Fix Version/s: feature-backlog
    • Component/s: couchbase-bucket
    • Security Level: Public
    • Labels:
      None
    • Triage:
      Untriaged

      Description

      The thing is that it will grow the disk queue, but yes it is a bug. Please file it and assign it to me. I'm almost positive that we don't persist items when the lock time changes.

      On Jan 20, 2013, at 2:20 PM, "Matt Ingenthron" <matt@couchbase.com> wrote:

      On 1/20/13 2:18 PM, "Mike Wiederhold" <mike@couchbase.com> wrote:

      I don't think we persist the lock time so it wouldn't survive an ejection.

      Given that ejection is mostly random, that seems like it could be a problem.

      Is that by intent? Shouldn't we prevent ejection for locked items (as a normal approach)?

      Matt

      No reviews matched the request. Check your Options in the drop-down menu of this sections header.

        Activity

        Hide
        maria Maria McDuff (Inactive) added a comment -

        Perry,

        is this a must-fix for the next release (targeting Dec) or can this be deferred?
        pls suggest if it is.

        Show
        maria Maria McDuff (Inactive) added a comment - Perry, is this a must-fix for the next release (targeting Dec) or can this be deferred? pls suggest if it is.
        Hide
        perry Perry Krug added a comment -

        No, this can be deferred from that release.

        Show
        perry Perry Krug added a comment - No, this can be deferred from that release.
        Hide
        mikew Mike Wiederhold added a comment -

        This will be resolved with the UPR changes

        Show
        mikew Mike Wiederhold added a comment - This will be resolved with the UPR changes
        Hide
        maria Maria McDuff (Inactive) added a comment -

        Mike, is this now part of UPR changes in 3.0?

        Show
        maria Maria McDuff (Inactive) added a comment - Mike, is this now part of UPR changes in 3.0?
        Hide
        drigby Dave Rigby added a comment -

        Pretty sure that lock time isn't replicated via DCP. Manu - could you please take a look and confirm / deny the situation with lock time replication - you can assign it to me once we have confirmed.

        Show
        drigby Dave Rigby added a comment - Pretty sure that lock time isn't replicated via DCP. Manu - could you please take a look and confirm / deny the situation with lock time replication - you can assign it to me once we have confirmed.

          People

          • Assignee:
            manu Manu Dhundi
            Reporter:
            perry Perry Krug
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:

              Gerrit Reviews

              There are no open Gerrit changes