The thing is that it will grow the disk queue, but yes it is a bug. Please file it and assign it to me. I'm almost positive that we don't persist items when the lock time changes.
On Jan 20, 2013, at 2:20 PM, "Matt Ingenthron" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On 1/20/13 2:18 PM, "Mike Wiederhold" <email@example.com> wrote:
I don't think we persist the lock time so it wouldn't survive an ejection.
Given that ejection is mostly random, that seems like it could be a problem.
Is that by intent? Shouldn't we prevent ejection for locked items (as a normal approach)?