Uploaded image for project: 'Couchbase Server'
  1. Couchbase Server
  2. MB-21991

AuthN : Client-Server Certificate Authentication

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Improvement
    • Status: Resolved
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Spock.Next
    • 5.5.0
    • clients
    • None

    Description

      At a high-level : Couchbase should support client-server authentication via certificates

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          No reviews matched the request. Check your Options in the drop-down menu of this sections header.

          Activity

            Tyler Mitchell – lets work on this one since I need your help to play with the sdks to ensure this works.

            Can we maybe pick Node.js / .NET this time?

            Thanks,

            djp Don Pinto [X] (Inactive) added a comment - Tyler Mitchell – lets work on this one since I need your help to play with the sdks to ensure this works. Can we maybe pick Node.js / .NET this time? Thanks,

            For X.509 documentation examples on client-side SDK's - Amarantha Kulkarni, please work with Tyler Mitchell directly.

            djp Don Pinto [X] (Inactive) added a comment - For X.509 documentation examples on client-side SDK's - Amarantha Kulkarni , please work with Tyler Mitchell directly.
            amarantha.kulkarni Amarantha Kulkarni (Inactive) added a comment - Thanks! Already being tracked:  https://issues.couchbase.com/browse/DOC-2748
            lynn.straus Lynn Straus added a comment - - edited

            per Vulcan operations meeting on 3/1 the understanding is that this ticket will be used to track PM verification of the feature.  Don Pinto [X]  please confirm you are covering this.  Thank you!

            lynn.straus Lynn Straus added a comment - - edited per Vulcan operations meeting on 3/1 the understanding is that this ticket will be used to track PM verification of the feature.  Don Pinto [X]   please confirm you are covering this.  Thank you!

            Don Pinto [X] please reopen if you feel this enhancement is not covered in the implementation we have

            raju Raju Suravarjjala added a comment - Don Pinto [X] please reopen if you feel this enhancement is not covered in the implementation we have

            People

              sharal.sonia Sharal Sonia
              sharal.sonia Sharal Sonia
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              12 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Gerrit Reviews

                  There are no open Gerrit changes

                  PagerDuty