Details
-
Improvement
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Critical
-
7.2.0, 7.1.3
-
0
-
KV 2023-2, KV 2023-4
Description
As per analysis in MB-56346, out-of-seqno (OSO) backfill is not always beneficial compared to seqno backfill - for larger collections and/or small value sizes it can be significantly slower than "classic" seqno backfill.
We need to modify the logic of when OSO backfill is performed to not only consider when it is possible (i.e. client supports OSO, single collection from zero), but also when it is expected to be faster than seqno.